As we know, Scotland is in the midst of a housing emergency. Housing delivery has fallen sharply across both public and private sectors, with recent statistics pointing to a significant contraction in overall new‑build supply and widening gaps between demand and output.
Against this backdrop, private developers delivering homes for sale and increasingly Build‑to‑Rent (BTR) are operating in an environment where regulation plays an increasingly decisive role in determining how quickly new homes can be brought forward.
At the recent Scottish Property Federation (SPF) Annual Conference, it was clear that regulation (including, but not limited to, challenges around obtaining planning consent) is having an increasingly significant impact on development pipelines.
Planning and Technical Compliance Delays
Developers continue to identify planning delays as one of the biggest obstacles to efficient housing delivery. Stretched planning authority capacity, complex technical requirements, and uncertain Section 75 obligations are key contributors to slower decision‑making by planning authorities. These factors combine to create extended pre‑construction periods, undermine certainty and ultimately:
- Site starts are pushed back, delaying sales and rental release;
- Higher exposure to construction inflation as programmes lengthen;
- Phasing becomes harder to sequence, limiting efficient land and funding strategies.
Planning compliance has effectively become the metronome controlling the pace of housing delivery in Scotland.
Infrastructure and Abnormal Costs Driven by Regulation
Infrastructure requirements including drainage, roads, utilities, access, remediation are increasingly shaped by regulatory compliance frameworks. Recent analysis shows that infrastructure‑related abnormals have become major contributors to rising delivery costs and longer lead‑in periods due to:
- Prolonged engineering design cycles as developers meet adoptable standards;
- Delays securing utility capacity and approvals from statutory undertakers;
- Higher upfront capital before any plots can be built.
Infrastructure compliance now regularly dictates the critical path for delivery.
The Building Safety Levy
The forthcoming Building Safety Levy will impose an additional per‑unit or per‑sq‑metre cost on qualifying developments. Although the final Scottish structure is not yet confirmed, developers already need to build this into land values and viability assessments. Potential impacts include:
- Residual land values decrease, taking marginal sites out of play;
- Mixed‑tenure schemes require repricing and viability re‑testing;
- Developers face uncertainty on whether sites remain feasible until Levy rates are confirmed.
This is a direct and material regulatory cost that influences which projects proceed and at what speed.
RCC Delays — and Gail Matheson’s Self‑Certification Solution
At the SPF Annual Conference, Gail Matheson (Chief Executive of Highland Housing Alliance) noted that one of the most significant practical bottlenecks in housing delivery is Road Construction Consent (RCC).
RCC sits on the critical path for many sites. Local authority engineering teams are stretched, and iterative design checks on road layouts, drainage and adoptable standards can delay enabling works for months resulting in:
- Later mobilisation of contractors;
- Delayed completion of key infrastructure;
- Slower progression into plot construction; and
- Reduced certainty for sales and rental release programmes.
Her proposed solution: self‑certification
Gail suggested adopting a self‑certification model, similar to SER structural certification, where accredited civil engineers certify road‑design compliance. Councils then adopt an audit‑based approach rather than full detailed review. This is a pragmatic reform that could materially accelerate delivery across Scotland by supporting:
- Significantly faster RCC approvals;
- More predictable programming for site starts;
- Reduced bottlenecks during early development stages; and
- High assurance on standards while removing avoidable friction.
Conclusion
High standards in safety, environment and sustainability are essential for ensuring the delivery of high quality, safe homes in Scotland What is becoming increasingly challenging is the accumulation and sequencing of regulatory requirements, which together create slower approvals, higher pre‑construction costs, and greater uncertainty for development.
Addressing regulatory friction is essential if Scotland is to increase the pace at which private developers can deliver new homes. More pragmatic solutions, like Gail Matheson’s RCC proposal, would be welcomed to help avoid regulatory bottlenecks on the path to housing delivery.
Contributor
Partner
